M&S
Vol. XII / Issue 04
01, Leading Review Journal

Structural Bio-Engineering & Cellular Integration Metrics

Rigorous, evidence-based analysis of tissue matrix performance, degradation profiles, and biocompatibility, advancing the field one peer-reviewed insight at a time.

Peer Reviews
1,247
Institutions
86
Est.
2013
Macro view of a bio-engineered tissue scaffold matrix under clinical lighting
Fig. 01
Polymer scaffold
lattice, 400x mag.
Conexeu Research Archive
Researchers examining structural biomaterial samples
Lab 04 · Matrix Analysis
02, Our Mission MSR / EST. 2019

Where Engineering Rigor Meets Clinical Relevance

Matrix & Scaffold Review publishes rigorous, evidence-based commentary on structural biocompatibility, degradation profiles, and cellular integration metrics, with a spotlight on the engineering breakthroughs behind Conexeu's proprietary tissue matrix technology.

100%
Peer-Reviewed
Evidence.
Based Analysis
About the Journal
03 / Research Areas

Precision Analysis Across the Bioengineering Spectrum

R.01 / ASSESS

Biocompatibility Assessment

Systematic evaluation of scaffold-host response, foreign-body interactions, and immunomodulatory profiles.

R.02 / MODEL

Degradation Profile Modeling

Time-resolved analysis of scaffold resorption kinetics and structural integrity under physiological conditions.

R.03 / MEASURE

Cellular Integration Metrics

Quantitative reporting on cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation across matrix architectures.

R.04 / REVIEW

Structural Biomaterial Reviews

Critical appraisal of novel synthetic and biologic matrix materials from bench to bedside.

R.05 / REPORT

Clinical Graft Performance Reports

Evidence-based outcome analysis of structural graft performance in orthopedic and reconstructive applications.

R.06 / ADVISE

Regulatory & Procurement Intelligence

Guidance on biomaterial classification, compliance pathways, and procurement evaluation criteria.

FIG. 03 // Editorial Coverage Matrix
Request Editorial Access
04, Latest Publications

From the Editorial Board

Histological cross-section
Vol. 12 / No. 03
March 14, 2025 Clinical Study

Conexeu Matrix Technology: Six-Month Integration Metrics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

A longitudinal analysis of 142 ACL reconstruction cases utilizing Conexeu's proprietary scaffold, tracking vascularization onset, collagen alignment, and mechanical load restoration.

Nanofiber scaffold mesh
Vol. 12 / No. 02
February 28, 2025 Materials Science

Degradation Kinetics of Decellularized Scaffolds Under Dynamic Mechanical Loading

Comparative in-vitro analysis of enzymatic breakdown rates across four decellularized matrices subjected to cyclic tensile stress at physiological frequencies.

Synthetic bone graft substitute
Vol. 12 / No. 01
January 17, 2025 Immunology

Immune Response Profiling in Next-Generation Synthetic Bone Graft Substitutes

Cytokine expression patterns and macrophage polarization data across 38 patient cohorts implanted with hydroxyapatite-collagen composite grafts over an 18-month window.

05, Peer Endorsements

Trusted by the Research Community

01 / Endorsement
The degradation profile analyses published here set the standard for how we evaluate scaffold candidates in our lab. Indispensable.
AR
Dr. A. Rosario
Tissue Engineering Lab / University Medical Center
02 / Endorsement
Matrix & Scaffold Review gives our procurement team the evidence base we need to make defensible graft selection decisions.
MC
M. Chen
Surgical Procurement / Regional Orthopedic Network
03 / Endorsement
The Conexeu technology coverage was the most technically thorough I have encountered in any clinical engineering publication.
JO
Prof. J. Okafor
Dept. of Biomedical Engineering
04 / Endorsement
Peer-reviewed rigor with genuine clinical applicability, rare in this field.
SM
Dr. S. Mehta
Reconstructive Orthopedics
04 Entries Swipe
06, Editorial Board

Scientific Leadership & Editorial Authority

Our editorial board convenes across biomedical engineering, clinical surgery, and polymer science. Each contributor is selected for rigor, institutional standing, and demonstrated depth in matrix-scaffold research.

Dr. Elena Vasquez, Editor-in-Chief
01 / Editor-in-Chief Est. 2019

Dr. Elena Vasquez

Ph.D., Biomedical Engineering  /  Stanford Institute for Tissue Engineering

Specialization, Extracellular Matrix Remodeling

Dr. Vasquez leads editorial direction with an emphasis on degradation kinetics and scaffold longevity across load-bearing applications. Her fifteen-year investigation of ECM remodeling in synthetic constructs has shaped how the field evaluates structural persistence. She reviews every submission touching kinetics or matrix architecture personally.

Publications
142 peer-reviewed
H-Index
58
Focus
Kinetics & Scaffolds
Dr. Marcus Thorn, Senior Editor
02 / Senior Editor Joined 2020

Dr. Marcus Thorn

M.D., Ph.D., Orthopedic Surgery & Biomaterials  /  Johns Hopkins Musculoskeletal Center

Specialization, Clinical Integration Outcomes

Dr. Thorn brings the operating room into every editorial decision. His work correlates in-vivo graft performance with pre-clinical scaffold metrics, closing the gap between bench data and surgical reality. He curates our clinical case review track and oversees all submissions involving human outcomes data.

Publications
98 peer-reviewed
Clinical Trials
11 principal
Focus
Graft Performance
Dr. Priya Nair, Associate Editor
03 / Associate Editor Joined 2021

Dr. Priya Nair

Ph.D., Cellular Biology  /  ETH Zürich, Laboratory for Cell & Tissue Engineering

Specialization, Cell-Matrix Interactions

Dr. Nair examines the interface where living cells meet engineered scaffolds. Her editorial focus targets immunomodulation, macrophage response, and long-term cellular tolerance of synthetic matrices. She insists on quantitative immunological data in every scaffold-integration submission the journal accepts.

Publications
67 peer-reviewed
Grants Reviewed
NIH & EU / 40+
Focus
Immunomodulation
Prof. Jan Kowalski, Scientific Advisor
04 / Scientific Advisor Since 2019

Prof. Jan Kowalski

D.Sc., Polymer Chemistry  /  Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry

Specialization, Structural Biomaterial Synthesis

Prof. Kowalski anchors the journal's material science rigor and its regulatory framing. His four decades of polymer research inform how we evaluate synthesis reproducibility, monomer purity, and compliance under EMA and FDA pathways. He mentors early-career authors on the path from bench formulation to clinical-grade material.

Publications
210 peer-reviewed
Patents
23 granted
Focus
Regulatory Chemistry
Editorial Contact

Submissions, correspondence, and peer-review inquiries are handled through the office of the Editor-in-Chief. Full board CVs and disclosure statements are available on request.

Contact the Editorial Office
§ 04

Editorial Engagement

Advance the Science. Contribute to the Field.

Submit original research, request our editorial media kit, or subscribe to the Matrix & Scaffold Review bulletin for quarterly publication digests.

Peer Review
Double-blind
Response
≤ 21 days
Impact Factor
4.82
Indexed
PubMed

ISSN 2837-1194 · Quarterly · Open editorial correspondence

07, Editorial Office

Connect with Our Editorial Team

01 / Mailing Address
Matrix & Scaffold Review
Editorial Office, Suite 402
1140 Biomedical Sciences Way
Cambridge, MA 02139 · USA
02 / Office Hours
MON – FRI
09:00 – 17:00 EST
SAT
Submissions Only
SUN
Closed
03 / Publication Schedule

Quarterly publication cycle. Issues released MAR · JUN · SEP · DEC, with peer review windows opening six weeks prior to each release.

ISSN
2831-4497 (Print)
2831-4500 (Online)
Direct Inquiry Form
Response · 3–5 Business Days
FIG. 07.01  /  EDITORIAL CONTACT INTERFACE MSR · VOL. XII · RESPONSE PROTOCOL
08 / Get in Touch Editorial Desk

Reach the Matrix & Scaffold Review Editorial Desk.

For manuscript submissions, subscription inquiries, institutional access, and procurement evaluations, our editorial team responds within two business days.

Form / Inquiry.01 Fields: 04
Encrypted transmission
Sec / 08
Contact / Inline
Boston, MA